News4Neighbors Endorses: Lew Frederick, Ted Wheeler, Amanda Fritz and Erik Sten
Buy Local
Hawthorne Boulevard Business Association
The Hawthorne Boulevard Business Association exists to promote the general more...
Lew Frederick is simply the best qualified candidate running in this election period. We'd have endorsed him for County Chair, for City Council, or for Governor of the State. Lew Frederick is simply that good. While Lew's opponents in this race, Jeff Cogen and Xander Patterson are good people and would do a good job for our county, our county needs Lew Frederick.
If there is one thing the current County leadership has made clear, it is the need for coordinated leadership. The bickering, whining and complaining that have become business as usual over at the County are clear signs that both the County Chair and the other commissioners need to know how to work together. This was the first debate question asked by an N4N reader, and Lew Frederick showed himself as the voice of an elder statesman and diplomat:
http://www.news4neighbors.net/comments.pl?cid=716&
Lew is a black man, he's a geek, he's a teacher, he's a reporter, but most importantly, Lew Fredrick is a man of character and integrity, a man who can work together with other people productively. We need Lew now more than ever.
Ted Wheeler for County Chair http://www.wheelerforcountychair.com/
Ted Wheeler is the only endorsement we are making who also received the endorsement of the Portland Tribune and the Oregonian. The County needs Ted and Ted needs the County. We need a new approach at the County. The gridlock and bickering of the current team has been embarrassing to watch and unproductive to boot.
Ted brings the fiscal skills, progressive politics and raw energy and determination our region needs. While climbing Mt. Everest is a footnote in Ted's campaign literature, it is indicative of the determination and effort we can expect from him on our behalf. If Diane Linn is faulted for not making the effort to reach out and engage her fellow board members (and she is), then Ted Wheeler is just the man to cross the chasm. In our earliest coverage of his campaign launch, Candidate Wheeler vowed to eliminate liaison positions to the other commissioners, saying he would become that liaison. Clearly Ted Wheeler has something to prove, and we are a region in need of having something proved. Ted Wheeler is the right person at the right time.
Amanda Fritz for City Council http://www.amandafritzforcitycouncil.com/
Amanda Fritz is a candidate of the people. She is a candidate with support across the neighborhoods of Portland. She is one of us, yet more so. She has taken on the task of an ordinary citizen, she has sat on budget advisory committees to the City, she has attended meetings as a volunteer that most citizens would find too boring to tolerate. And she has done it all with energy, determination, humor and an indomitable will.
While her opponent, sitting Councilman Dan Saltzman has done a fine job over the years, his pledge to bring more energy and focus to the job if re-elected, doesn't match the energy, focus and perseverance Amanda Fritz brings to her work every day.
Amanda has extensive training and experience as a nurse on the psychiatric units of our local hospitals. Amanda has years of real world experience in managing difficult personalities and identifying delusional thinking patterns. We can think of no better skill set to inject into City Council at this time, and no better person, man or woman, than Amanda Fritz.
Erik Sten for City Council http://www.erikforportland.com/ We can find no clearer case for the soul of Portland than the clear choice presented by Erik Sten and Ginny Burdick in this race. Indeed, this race has become a referendum on what's right about Portland vs. what's wrong about Portland, and for Erik the question is whether what's right is more important than what is wrong.
Ginny Burdick seems like a fine enough candidate personally, don't get me wrong. But to challenge a Portland icon through heavy corporate funding while trying to undermine voter owned elections and depose the leadership of a new generation
For one thing, it's just galling to see Burdick's attempts to lead on school funding. Her campaign literature touts school funding as though it was the City Council, not the State Senate's job to solve this problem. To my eye, the City has done more than they should have been asked to do. If Ginny Burdick had wanted to save schools, she should have done it when it was her job in Salem.
The Burdick literature also faults Sten for his battles with PGE/Enron. Anyone who has seen the movie "The Smartest Guys in the Room" knows that Enron raked California over the coals for huge corporate profits while helping set up a new Republican governor. While Erik Sten fought Enron to a draw over PGE, Burdick's firm was working for Enron. I can't believe that Portland's soul is on the side of Enron.
Again, Burdick has tried to frame the first stumbling steps of Voter Owned Elections (VOE) as a failure. While nationally, corporate owned elections are protected as free $peech, in Portland, VOE is the best chance for citizens like Amanda Fritz to enter public life and public service. At an estimated cost of 30 cents per Portland citizen, VOE is the best spent use of my tax money that I can remember. For a free and fair election, untainted by the rich and the powerful, I'd easily spend a whole dollar and consider it a great deal.
Erik Sten is a young, energetic Portland prodigy who is coming into his most productive years. A leader from Generation X, Erik represents the hopes and aspirations of an entire generation who have been waiting for their turn. While the old school tactics of corporate candidates play out on the national electoral stage and all too often in Salem, in Portland we've supported innovative local options.
Certainly, Portland has invested some money in Erik's education. He's one of the few local politicians who has actually learned the dangers of proprietary software during his experience with the Water Bureau's billing software. Erik's cautious interest in open source software options represents a balanced approach to an opportunity that this region needs. While reluctant to jump in feet first, Erik's research and outreach to this local industry cluster is the mix of encouragement and skepticism required for important IT decisions.
Whether the issues are framed as an Internet age issue, a corporate vs. voter owned election issue, or an affordable housing issue, Erik Sten represents the hopes and values of the progressive movement. For our city and for the soul of the nation, Erik Sten deserves your vote one more time as a vote of confidence in everything that Portland represents."
Reader Question (Score:3, Informative)
transparency would be good....
k
Answer: "We" is the editorial staff, currently composed of only David Pool, Editor in Chief, N4N.
Thanks for the question.
David
Where the candidates stand on public power (Score:3, Informative)
Liz Trojan
Oregon Public Power Coalition
www.cheappower.org
503-970-2069
Go to parent comment
sten's not gen x (Score:1, Interesting)
One small point--at 38, Sten's too old to be Gen X. I should know; I'm 38 myself. When we were in our 20s, we were called the Baby Busters, because we were the drop in births after the boom ended around '64-65. So he's a Buster. He just looks Gen X still.
TJ, Loaded Orygun
Re:sten's not gen x (Score:2)
I'm in that group myself. I think some of us are more boomer and some more X'er while sharing the same birth year. Thanks for bringing it up, I learned a lot at the Wikipedia entry!
Go to parent comment
Re:sten's not gen x (Score:2, Informative)
I'd suggest picking up the book Generations by Howe and Strauss (wiki [wikipedia.org]).
They define Gen-X as anybody born between 1961 and 1981. They do acknowledge that it's fuzzy, and people on the cusp between two generations will share cultural traits of each. The folks at the middle of the generation are the most like that generation.
Go to parent comment
Re:sten's not gen x (Score:2)
By this narrower definition or the broader one (and assuming Erik is in fact 38...born in 1968), Erik Sten is indeed a Generation X'er. He's a child of the Sixties. He's on the cusp of the Internet age (Internet, Relational Databases, Linux Torvalds, and Unix all date their births to the late 60's and early 70's). He's of a generation that traces their earliest political memories to Watergate and its aftermath. He is a member of a "slacker" generation that doesn't buy the post WW II enthusiasm for large corporate control and the suburban ideals of the 1950's.
At the same time, Generations X, Y, and Z all owe a great debt of gratitude to the Boomers, the Silent generation and the Great Generation who built America, for better or worse into what we are today. More than any other, the Boomer generation has been the Guinea Pig generation.
The Guinea Pig generation did the drugs, got their heads bashed in Chicago, had unprotected sex and learned the hard lessons of the Vietnam War for us. As X'ers, we have a legacy of great rock and roll, a woman's right to choose, and a once embattled military industrial complex to show for the Boomer generation.
What's more, we can thank Boomers for their clinical trials of everything from thalidamide, valium, Vicodin, and the illicit drugs - heroin, coke, and LSD. As the perennial "younger sibling" generation, X'ers have benefitted by learning from the Boomer mistakes. In the future, as the X'ers, reach the age of nips, tucks and implants (some are there already), they will benefit from the guinea pigs generation's experimentations. Medical care will largely be defined by whether the boomers decide to fix the system, or suffer the indignities of an inefficient and ineffective behemoth.
Go to parent comment
Re:sten's not gen x (Score:3, Interesting)
As a Guinea Pig Generation, I appreciate your picks and the logic. One of the other things that came out of the 60's was the Media, and media Image becoming the defining element in politics. Hopefully electrionic media like yours can give the power back to the people. Good work and logic on your choices. My only complaint about Eric Sten is he gets snookered too much at public expense. A little old age and wisdom would help a lot. I worry with his Dad gone now if he has a mentor he can trust. The crowd at City Hall is so insular they only know Politics which tends to tear apart and not build Community. I think of the Robert Redford Movie called "The Candidate" and think of all these fellows that started out in Politics before they had much life experience or were grounded outside of it. I don't think anyone would argue that Goldschmidt lost his soul to it. I agree with your pick of Fritz over Saltzman. She has that life experience, and has really worked and volunteered her time to make Portland a better place. I have a hard time reconciling the polished TV adds for Saltzman "For the Children" when you look at the economic facts, just the Interstate Urban Renewal Project alone that Saltzman voted for diverting over millions a year, which his children's initiative only replaces a fraction. That money goes to private not public organizations, so it is hard to verify the equitable distribution of the monies. Interstate is only one of the Urban Renewal districts, not to mention the $50-70 million TRAM, which is financed by TIF (Tax Increment Funding) The Oregonian Article from 2000 says it all. It makes me have pause with both Sten and Saltzman.
Paper: Oregonian, The (Portland, OR)
Message: STEIN, KATZ KEEP TUSSLING OVER FUNDS CHAIRWOMAN AGAIN WILL PUSH FOR $2 MILLION A YEAR LOST DUE TO LIGHT RAIL
Author: SCOTT LEARN of the Oregonian Staff
Date: August 16, 2000
Section: PORTLAND ZONER
Page: B02
Stein, a longtime Katz cohort, wants $2 million a year from the city
for the next 25 years to help compensate for property taxes the new
Interstate Avenue urban renewal district would take away from Multnomah
County.
"I'm going to keep advocating for this," said Stein, who will speak at
the hearing tonight. " She's not happy with me and I'm not happy with
her. But we have a long relationship."
Stein is backed by the Citizens Crime Commission and the League of
Women Voters, long concerned about urban renewal districts sapping basic
city and county resources.
The council still is expected to unanimously support the overall urban
renewal plan, despite critics who question the value of a new light
rail line and the legality of declaring the district "blighted" to qualify
it for urban renewal.
The new district would cover 3,700 acres, the city's largest urban
renewal district. For the next 25 years, all property tax growth in the
district would go to pay off loans drawn to build projects and spur
economic development within the district. That would leave less for the city,
county and other local governments, but create an estimated 6,700 extra
jobs and 2,600 more homes.
The city and county will forgo an average of $3.6 million to $3.8
million in property taxes a year for basic services over the next 25 years,
the Portland Development Commission estimates.
Stein's $2 million-a-year plan would cover only a fraction of the need
for early Head Start. An estimated 5,090 low-income families with
infants and children to 3 years old are eligible for early Head Start in
Multnomah County; only 191 are served now. At $10,000 a slot, the full $2
million would add another 200 families a year.
Stein said the county's planned public safety levy for November 2002
would likely include more money for early childhood programs. A potential
gubernatorial candidate in 2002, Stein said she expects the state and
other governments to chip in, too.
Go to parent comment
VOE..the Movie! (Score:1, Offtopic)